Bill Recommendation Essay

Is it a good idea for those individuals convicted of fortify robbery to receive double the blame that it is now? In my opinion the consequence is no. Policy fashioning in the field of lamentable evaluator is extremely vital to society. Punishments basin be real confusing in the feature of what is appropriate. What is besides much and what is too low?thither have been legion(predicate) studies that show that in that respect is little or no preventive of abuse such as gird robbery when the punishment is a massive condemnation to prison house house house. The reason for this lack of halt is be wooing the person who is assignting the annoyance or crimes knows what is at stake, yet he or she chooses to position the robbery anyway. This is because the gains of that robbery outweigh the prison sentence.The main purpose of this bill is to breach or at least convert magnitude the amount of build up robbery that is cosmos committed by putting those who commit the c rime behind proscribe for a longer period of time. This seems like a good idea at starting line glance. However there is more(prenominal) to this proposition. protraction the prison sentence is cosmos apply as a deterrent or to simply take the bad guys finish off the street for longer. This has non worked in the ancient and go away non work now. veneering a long sentence has not deterred robbery from happening.If prison sentencing was enough robbery would not be around in society especially not as frequent as it is today. According to a study done by the FBI in 2006 447,403 robberies were reported to the police, which equals out to a charge per unit of one robbery per minute in the United States (McGoey, 2014). The punishment for robbery can be up to 25 long time in the United States. Doubling that and making the sentence 50 years will hardly make any change in the robbery rate. If anything it would just cause the jails and prisons tobecome overpopu slowlyd quicker, cos ting taxpayers more money. summit Recommendation in that respect are more effective ways to address a crime than make the punishments more intent or longer. The unmixed drill of criminology is what I base my recommendation on. In the late 1700s, which are the time that the trueal shoal came about, the punishment for crimes was extremely cruel and would be seen today as barbaric. Cesare de Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham played a tremendous role in the possibility of criminology and criminal justice today would not be where it is without them. Their main focus was to change magnitude the harsh punishments implemented by the judicial system at the time (Schmalleger, 2012).Cesare de Baccaria believed that preventing crimes would upbeat a society more than difficult someone who committed a crime. This teaching was the driving force of the classic school of criminology. He believed the punishment should fit the crime for instance theft should be penalise through the use of fines a nd crimes that cause person-to-person injury to be punished by corporal punishment. This would, in turn he believed, prevent these crimes from happening. Jeremy Bentham viewed crime a little differently than Beccaria. Bentham was viewed as a utilitarian. He believed that the punishment for any crime moldiness be that of the greater good for the community. basically stating that any pain being utilise as a punishment to state of wards an wrongdoer must be justified to hit the good of the society.Modern criminal justice still holds its innovation in that of the classic school of criminology. Having said that, long prison sentences do act as a major deterrent for many criminals, exactly poses a major conflict of ideas to that of the classic school of thought due to the fact that crimes are committed based on free will and rational thinking. in that respect are Bill Recommendationmany factors such as emotional asymmetry in s sudden moment, and genial and physical disorders that a longer prison sentence simply would not abolish. There is also the very likely dislodge that drugs and or alcohol is involved.If the offender is being driven by an addiction nothing, for sure not a longer prison sentence is sledding to persuade his or her decision (Schmalleger, 2012)With all of that being said, the solve to decreasing crime, more specifically armed robbery, a longer prison sentence is not the answer. The question at die is what is the answer? This is a question that is going to be debated as long as crime is resent in the population. teen criminals usually mature into adult criminals, so perhaps putting more criminal emphasis on juvenile crime must be done. In gain to everything, it is well known that drugs are the foundation of many crimes. Drugs are responsible for many thefts and robberies, and more time behind bars is not going to make a drug addict think doubly before robbing someone. More emphasis postulate to be put on the war on drugs and alcohol addiction. Put the taxpayers money to good use by taenia the spread of drugs, not on paying for more people inside if jails. Lets cut off the robberies from happening.ReferencesMcGoey, C.E. (2014). Robbery Facts Violent Crime Against Persons. Retrieved from http//www.crimedoctorSchmalleger, F. (2012). Criminology immediately An Integrative Introduction (6th ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook prayer database.